This amendment to Section 32G of chapter 90 of the General Laws suggests that state-licensed driving schools must meet certain conditions to offer virtual instruction. These include maintaining a physical presence through owned or leased offices and having a solid operational history of at least three consecutive years within the Commonwealth. By establishing these criteria, the bill aims to ensure that virtual programs maintain a standard of education and valid oversight by state authorities, ultimately benefiting both students and regulatory bodies.
Summary
House Bill H3661, presented by Representative Carole A. Fiola, seeks to amend existing legislation governing driver education in Massachusetts. The proposed bill specifically allows for the approval of driver education curriculums offered in a virtual instructor-led format by state-licensed driving schools. This change reflects an acknowledgment of technological advancements in education and the need for flexibility in driver education delivery methods, especially pertinent in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted the demand for online learning solutions.
Contention
While the bill is designed to modernize driver education, it may face scrutiny regarding the effectiveness and quality of virtual versus traditional in-person education. Critics might argue that virtual instruction could diminish the hands-on experience critical for developing competent and safe drivers. There could also be concerns about whether the specific stipulations regarding physical presence and operational history may inadvertently limit competition, favoring long-established driving schools over newer entrants that may offer innovative approaches but lack the required years of operation.