Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H1861

Introduced
2/27/25  

Caption

Providing transparency in third party litigation financing

Impact

The proposed legislation will significantly alter the landscape of litigation financing in Massachusetts. By implementing transparency requirements, it educates consumers on their rights and the implications of entering financing agreements. Additionally, it will limit the ability of litigation funding companies to exert influence over legal proceedings, ensuring that the rights of plaintiffs and their attorneys remain intact. This approach aims to alleviate concerns about conflicts of interest and the ethical implications of financing arrangements, thus enhancing the integrity of the judicial process in the state.

Summary

House Bill H1861 aims to provide transparency in third-party litigation financing by establishing regulations that govern how consumer litigation funding companies operate in Massachusetts. The bill specifically mandates that these companies disclose critical information in their contracts to consumers, including the total amount funded, charges, and repayment obligations. Furthermore, it establishes a ceiling on interest rates at 36% per annum, ensuring that consumers are not subjected to exorbitant fees. By categorizing litigation financing in a regulated framework, the bill seeks to protect consumers from potential exploitation by funding companies while empowering them with information necessary to make informed decisions regarding legal financing options.

Contention

Despite the bill's intent to protect consumers, there are points of contention that have emerged during discussions. Critics argue that the bill may inadvertently restrict access to funds for individuals pursuing legal claims, especially those who may not have the financial capability to proceed without such support. Furthermore, there is concern regarding the defined limits on charges, which some believe could drive legitimate funding sources out of the market. Proponents assert that the consumer protection aspect outweighs these concerns and is crucial for fostering fair practices in the rapidly evolving field of litigation financing.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MA S749

Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA H2344

Providing for greater police transparency

MA S2492

Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA S391

Providing transparency and accountability of nursing home ownership

MA S3012

Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA S2499

Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA S2520

Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA H1187

Providing financial transparency for patients receiving care at hospital-based outpatient facilities

MA H945

To ensure prescription drug cost transparency and affordability

MA H4456

Relative to financial technology services

Similar Bills

MA S680

To provide transparency in third party litigation financing

MN HF2677

Consumers in Crisis Protection Act adopted, civil penalties provided, and reports required.

MN SF2929

Consumers in Crisis Protection Act

IN HB1160

Civil proceeding advance payment contracts and commercial litigation financing.

CA SB577

State Government.

WV SB850

Updating Consumer Credit and Protection Act

CT HB05399

An Act Concerning The Assignment Of Certain Property Tax, Water And Sewer Liens.

CT SB00941

An Act Concerning The Assignment Of Certain Property, Tax, Water And Sewer Liens.