Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB497

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/21/25
• Refer: 3/21/25

Caption

Providing for testing for dangerous levels of radon and remediation measures in school buildings, residential buildings, residential homes and commercial buildings; and imposing penalties.

Impact

The passage of SB 497 will significantly alter the legal framework regarding radon management in Pennsylvania. School boards will be responsible for conducting regular radon tests and ensuring results are transparent and accessible to parents and guardians. Residential landlords and home sellers will face similar obligations to disclose radon test results to prospective tenants and buyers. This legislative change aims to prevent health risks related to radon exposure while promoting a healthier living environment overall.

Summary

Senate Bill 497, known as the Radon Remediation Act, mandates the testing and remediation of dangerous levels of radon across various types of buildings including schools, residential buildings, and commercial properties within Pennsylvania. The bill stipulates that all schools must perform radon testing by June 30, 2027, and implement remediation measures if dangerous levels are found, defined as exceeding four picocuries per liter. This proactive approach is designed to enhance safety standards and protect public health, particularly for children in schools and families in residential homes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 497 appears to be supportive, particularly among health advocacy groups and environmental organizations. Proponents of the Bill argue that the health protection measures proposed within the act are critical for safeguarding public well-being and ensuring that communities are informed of potential hazards. Conversely, some concerns have been raised about the feasibility and costs associated with frequent testing and compliance, particularly for smaller property owners or underfunded school districts.

Contention

While SB 497 is largely seen as a positive step towards improving safety, there are contentious points, particularly regarding the administrative burden it places on educational and housing institutions. Some critics argue that the enforcement of this rigorous testing schedule could strain resources, especially in areas already facing financial challenges. The balance between ensuring thorough testing and maintaining sustainable operational capabilities for these institutions will be a critical aspect moving forward.