Crimes and offenses; crime of loitering, exceptions further provided; mask usage policies on school campuses, authorized
Impact
The provisions of HB559 are designed to create clearer guidelines regarding loitering while also allowing educational institutions the flexibility to enforce their own mask policies during protests and public gatherings. The amending of loitering laws aims to specify what constitutes loitering and provides exemptions for individuals wearing masks in certain contexts, including adherence to medical guidance or state emergencies. This adjustment could potentially reduce the number of arrests related to loitering, particularly for individuals wearing masks who are acting within the parameters specified by health authorities.
Summary
House Bill 559 addresses several key issues related to crimes and offenses, particularly focusing on the crime of loitering and mask usage policies on educational campuses. The bill amends Section 13A-11-9 of the Code of Alabama, which outlines the parameters of loitering and sets forth exceptions, especially concerning individuals wearing masks. Importantly, the bill permits local boards of education and public institutions of higher education to establish their own policies regarding mask usage during public assemblies on their property, thereby giving educational institutions more authority over their regulations and responses to public health issues.
Sentiment
Reactions to the bill have been mixed within the legislative body and the public. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary update to loitering laws that respects individual rights while addressing ongoing public health concerns, particularly in the wake of COVID-19. However, critics express concerns that the bill may lead to increased discretion among law enforcement, potentially resulting in inconsistent enforcement of loitering laws, especially in vulnerable communities. The tension between public safety and civil liberties is at the forefront of discussions regarding the bill.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the balance between law enforcement authority and individual rights. While the bill provides exemptions for those wearing masks, there are concerns that it may not adequately protect against potential discrimination in enforcement. Additionally, the empowerment given to local educational institutions to craft their own policies raises questions about uniformity and adherence to public health guidance, as different institutions may adopt varying levels of restrictiveness related to mask usage.
Crimes & Offenses, raises max. age for offenses involving obscene materials with depictions of children, authorizes punitive damages for victims of those offenses, and directs Board of Ed. to require policies related to those offenses
Health occupations: health professionals; permanent revocation of license or registration if convicted of sexual conduct under pretext of medical treatment; provide for. Amends sec. 16226 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16226). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4121'23
Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.