Wisconsin Senate Bill SB209

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/16/25
• Refer: 4/16/25

Caption

Limiting liability relating to traffic control devices for manufacturers and others.

Impact

If enacted, SB209 would significantly alter the legal landscape surrounding the accountability of those involved in the production and maintenance of traffic control devices. The limitation of liability would extend to claims for personal injury and property damage, encompassing negligence, strict liability, and breaches of warranty. Advocates argue that this bill will promote the installation of widely accepted safety measures while reducing the burden on manufacturers and others who contribute to public safety through their products.

Summary

Senate Bill 209 aims to limit the liability of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, installers, and owners of traffic control devices in the state of Wisconsin. The bill stipulates that such parties would not be held liable for damages resulting from the design, manufacture, distribution, or installation of a traffic control device, provided that the device adheres to specific standards set forth in the traffic control devices manual adopted by the Department of Transportation. This measure is intended to create a legal framework that encourages compliance and enhances the safety and effectiveness of traffic control devices on public roadways.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, the bill has spurred debate among stakeholders. Proponents contend that the legislation could streamline compliance efforts and reduce lawsuit risks for those in the traffic management sector. However, critics express concerns that such liability protections might lead to a dilution of safety standards. They argue that without adequate accountability, there may be less incentive for manufacturers to adhere strictly to safety protocols, resulting in potential hazards for the public.

Notable_points

The bill includes a rebuttable presumption of compliance for manufacturers, which implies that they will be presumed to have met state standards unless proven otherwise by clear evidence in court. This provision raises questions about the balance between encouraging business practices and ensuring safety in public infrastructure. As discussions around SB209 unfold, the implications for public safety and manufacturer accountability remain central topics of consideration.