Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1369

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
3/30/09  
Voted on by Senate
4/9/09  
Out of House Committee
5/22/09  
Voted on by House
5/27/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/30/09  

Caption

Relating to the appointment of attorneys ad litem and to court-appointed volunteer advocates in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

Impact

One significant impact of SB1369 is its effect on local administrative judges' duties. By formalizing the process of attorney appointment, the bill establishes a clear protocol for courts to follow when appointing attorneys ad litem. This change aims to eliminate confusion and inconsistency that may arise in the appointment process, thereby facilitating a smoother judicial process for cases affecting children. The law also mandates that attorneys selected for these roles must be part of a pre-established list, which should improve the quality of representation provided to minors in these sensitive legal situations.

Summary

SB1369, relating to the appointment of attorneys ad litem and court-appointed volunteer advocates in suits affecting the parent-child relationship, aims to streamline the process of appointing attorneys in cases where a child's welfare is in question. The bill modifies existing laws to require local administrative judges to maintain a list of qualified attorneys ad litem, ensuring that appointments are made efficiently and according to established procedures. The goal is to enhance the quality of legal representation for children involved in legal proceedings and create a more organized approach to managing these cases within the court system.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB1369 relate to the administration of the list of attorneys and the potential for bias in appointments. Critics may argue that a fixed list could restrict choices and limit opportunities for equally qualified attorneys not on the designated list. Furthermore, there could be concerns about how effectively local administrative judges maintain and update these lists, which is crucial for ensuring that the appointed attorneys possess the necessary experience and skills to handle complex cases effectively. Proponents, however, argue that a standardized list will prevent arbitrary decisions and promote fairness in the appointment process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX SB2277

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB19

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB43

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB1544

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB24

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB13

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB1499

Relating to the duties of court-appointed guardians ad litem, attorneys ad litem, and amicus attorneys in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB4850

Relating to certain procedures in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB2246

Relating to suits affecting the parent-child relationship, including the payment and enforcement of support ordered in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB869

Relating to suits affecting the parent-child relationship, including the payment and enforcement of support ordered in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

Similar Bills

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

TX SB2384

Relating to the creation of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Regional Administrative Judicial Districts, the creation of the office of regional district attorney for each district, and the powers and duties of regional district attorneys.

CA AB1546

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: statute of limitations.

NC H116

Modify Laws Affecting District Attorneys

NJ S1751

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

NJ A1524

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

NJ S2121

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

KY SB65

AN ACT relating to deficient administrative regulations and declaring an emergency.