Michigan House Bill HR0091

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/6/25
• Refer: 5/6/25
• Report Pass: 5/7/25
• Passed: 5/14/25

Caption

A resolution to support President Trump’s policies to increase the nation’s energy infrastructure and security, which have facilitated emergency permitting for the Enbridge Line 5 project.

Impact

The resolution acknowledges the historical significance of the Line 5 pipeline, which has operated since 1953 under the Straits of Mackinac. With ongoing debates surrounding its safety and environmental impact, including lawsuits filed by the Michigan Attorney General aimed at shutting down operations, House Resolution 91 positions itself in support of continued federal approval for the pipeline and associated infrastructure projects. By affirming these policies, the resolution seeks to lend power to the argument that such projects are vital for energy security and economic stability in the region.

Summary

House Resolution 91 is a resolution introduced by Representatives Prestin, Fairbairn, Markkanen, Roth, and Borton, that expresses support for former President Trump's policies aimed at increasing the nation's energy infrastructure and security. A specific focus of the resolution is the Enbridge Line 5 project, a critical pipeline that delivers crude oil and natural gas liquids across Michigan and into Ontario. The resolution emphasizes the importance of this pipeline, stating that it supplies a substantial portion of the propane demand for both the Upper Peninsula and statewide, highlighting its role in Michigan's energy landscape.

Conclusion

Ultimately, House Resolution 91 serves not only to express support for federal energy policies but also to make a case for the necessity of the Enbridge Line 5 project for both local and national energy requirements. As discussions continue, this resolution reflects the complexity of balancing energy needs with environmental stewardship in modern governance.

Contention

It is important to note that the resolution is contextualized within a broader discourse concerning energy policy and environmental protection. Proponents of the resolution argue that expanding the energy infrastructure is critical for meeting pressing needs, while opponents raise concerns about the environmental risks associated with the pipeline. The resolution also references an executive order issued by President Trump to expedite infrastructure projects under a national energy emergency declaration, which has heightened the urgency and significance of the ongoing debates surrounding Line 5's operations and future.