Michigan Senate Bill SB0312

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/2/23
• Refer: 5/2/23

Caption

Weapons: firearms; corrections code of 1953; update references. Amends sec. 33b of 1953 PA 232 (MCL 791.233b). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0308'23

Impact

The implications of SB 312 revolve around its effect on the corrections system in Michigan. By tightening the parole eligibility criteria, the bill promotes the notion that more serious crimes should result in longer imprisonment before inmates can be considered for early release. This change may result in longer periods of incarceration for some offenders, which supporters argue will enhance public safety by ensuring that individuals who commit heinous crimes serve a significant part of their sentences. Conversely, this could lead to overcrowding in prisons and increased costs associated with extended inmate tenure.

Summary

Senate Bill 312 seeks to amend section 33b of the Corrections Code of 1953 (Public Act 232) in Michigan. This bill specifically addresses the eligibility criteria for parole for individuals convicted of certain offenses under the Michigan Penal Code. Notably, the bill stipulates that individuals convicted of particular crimes are not eligible for parole until they have served their minimum sentence, minus allowances for disciplinary credits. This stipulation applies to convictions for crimes outlined in various sections of the Michigan Penal Code, ensuring that those convicted of serious offenses serve a substantial portion of their sentences prior to being considered for parole.

Contention

The discussions surrounding SB 312 highlight various points of contention among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Proponents laud the bill for enhancing the seriousness of punishment associated with violent and serious offenses, aligning with public sentiment that offenders should face strict consequences for their actions. However, critics raise concerns regarding the potential impact on prison populations, arguing that extended incarceration does not necessarily correlate with improved public safety. They advocate for a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of parole in rehabilitating offenders rather than solely focusing on punitive measures.