Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Nevada Senate Bill SB467

Introduced
5/15/25  
Refer
5/15/25  
Report Pass
5/28/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Refer
5/29/25  
Report Pass
5/31/25  
Enrolled
6/5/25  
Chaptered
6/11/25  

Caption

Revises provisions relating to cybersecurity. (BDR 19-1149)

Impact

The bill is expected to have a significant impact on state laws related to information security, particularly by repealing previous statutory provisions dealing with the now-abolished Nevada Office of Cyber Defense Coordination. Notably, it also asserts that certain records and plans relating to cybersecurity incidents will remain confidential, which could enhance operational security for state agencies. Furthermore, the bill calls for the Chief Information Officer to adopt regulations that ensure effective coordination of cybersecurity activities among state agencies and local governments, aiming for a cooperative approach to manage risks and protect against vulnerabilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 467 aims to enhance the cybersecurity framework within the state of Nevada by restructuring the existing cyber defense governance. The bill transfers the Nevada Office of Cyber Defense Coordination from the Department of Public Safety to the Office of the Chief Information Officer within the Office of the Governor. In doing so, it merges this office with the Office of Information Security, resulting in a more unified approach to cybersecurity governance across state agencies. The Act establishes a clear outline of responsibilities and duties for the newly formed Office of Information Security and Cyber Defense, with a particular emphasis on protecting information systems vital to public safety and welfare.

Contention

There may be notable points of contention regarding the confidentiality provisions established by the bill. While proponents argue that such measures are necessary for protecting sensitive information against cyber threats, critics might raise concerns about transparency and the potential for reduced public oversight of cybersecurity operations within the government. Additionally, the integration of the two offices raises questions about resource allocation and efficiency in addressing cybersecurity challenges faced by various state entities, signaling possible discussions about prioritizing cybersecurity funding and focus within state governmental structures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NV SB2

Revises provisions relating to emergency management. (BDR 36-237)

NV AB149

Revises provisions relating to education. (BDR 34-76)

NV SB10

Revises provisions related to the Nevada State Infrastructure Bank. (BDR 35-358)

NV AB168

Revises provisions relating to fetal and infant mortality. (BDR 40-64)

NV AB517

Revises provisions governing the Legislative Counsel Bureau. (BDR 17-447)

NV SB441

Revises provisions relating to public health. (BDR 40-451)

NV SB103

Revises provisions governing the Nevada Sentencing Commission within the Department of Sentencing Policy. (BDR 14-308)

NV AB77

Revises provisions governing economic development. (BDR 18-711)

NV AB353

Revises provisions relating to governmental administration. (BDR 18-930)

NV SB7

Revises various provisions relating to gaming. (BDR 41-260)

Similar Bills

CA AB1242

Information security.

MS HB1333

Department of Information Technology Services; require all state agencies to use for computer equipment and services.

TX HB150

Relating to the establishment of the Texas Cyber Command and the transfer to it of certain powers and duties of the Department of Information Resources.

NV SB12

Revises provisions relating to the Office of the Chief Information Officer within the Office of the Governor. (BDR 19-280)

CA AB1306

California Cybersecurity Integration Center.

KS SB291

House Substitute for SB 291 by Committee on Legislative Modernization - Transferring all cybsersecurity services under the chief information technology officer of each branch of government, creating chief information security officers within the judicial and legislative branches, requiring a chief information security officer to be appointed by the attorney general, Kansas bureau of investigation, secretary of state, state treasurer and insurance commissioner and requiring the chief information security officers to implement certain minimum cybersecurity standards, requiring the information technology executive council to develop a plan to integrate executive branch information technology services under the executive chief information technology officer, making and concerning appropriations for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2026, for the office of information technology, Kansas information security office and the adjutant general, authorizing certain transfers and imposing certain limitations and restrictions and directing or authorizing certain disbursements and procedures for all state agencies and requiring legislative review of state agencies not in compliance with this act.

MA S49

Relative to cybersecurity and artificial intelligence

KS HB2019

Implementing additional reporting requirements for information technology projects and state agencies, requiring additional information technology security training and status reports, requiring reporting of significant cybersecurity audits and changing the membership requirements, terms of members and the quorum requirements for the information technology executive council.