Nevada Senate Bill SB467

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Engrossed: 5/29/25
• Refer: 5/29/25
• Report Pass: 5/31/25
• Enrolled: 6/5/25

Caption

Revises provisions relating to cybersecurity. (BDR 19-1149)

Impact

The bill is expected to have a significant impact on state laws related to information security, particularly by repealing previous statutory provisions dealing with the now-abolished Nevada Office of Cyber Defense Coordination. Notably, it also asserts that certain records and plans relating to cybersecurity incidents will remain confidential, which could enhance operational security for state agencies. Furthermore, the bill calls for the Chief Information Officer to adopt regulations that ensure effective coordination of cybersecurity activities among state agencies and local governments, aiming for a cooperative approach to manage risks and protect against vulnerabilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 467 aims to enhance the cybersecurity framework within the state of Nevada by restructuring the existing cyber defense governance. The bill transfers the Nevada Office of Cyber Defense Coordination from the Department of Public Safety to the Office of the Chief Information Officer within the Office of the Governor. In doing so, it merges this office with the Office of Information Security, resulting in a more unified approach to cybersecurity governance across state agencies. The Act establishes a clear outline of responsibilities and duties for the newly formed Office of Information Security and Cyber Defense, with a particular emphasis on protecting information systems vital to public safety and welfare.

Contention

There may be notable points of contention regarding the confidentiality provisions established by the bill. While proponents argue that such measures are necessary for protecting sensitive information against cyber threats, critics might raise concerns about transparency and the potential for reduced public oversight of cybersecurity operations within the government. Additionally, the integration of the two offices raises questions about resource allocation and efficiency in addressing cybersecurity challenges faced by various state entities, signaling possible discussions about prioritizing cybersecurity funding and focus within state governmental structures.