Requests the Senate Committee on Finance, or a subcommittee thereof, to study and make recommendations on court costs in suits involving the state and political subdivisions in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
Impact
If the recommendations from this study are enacted, the resolution could lead to significant changes in how court costs are addressed in litigation involving the state and its subdivisions. The objective is to establish a dedicated funding source to alleviate the current financial strain on the court system. This initiative would not only aim to resolve accrued debts but also ensure efficient handling of court proceedings without financial hindrance, thereby affecting the operations of the judicial system within the Nineteenth Judicial District.
Summary
Senate Resolution No. 120 urges and requests the Senate Committee on Finance, or a subcommittee thereof, to conduct a study regarding court costs in suits involving the state and political subdivisions in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. The resolution highlights the unique role of this court, which predominantly handles cases involving the state and its agencies, stressing the financial implications associated with such litigation. Presently, the state does not incur advance costs when filing suits, resulting in significant fiscal burdens on the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, accumulating debts reaching over $7 million over the past decade.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding SR120 appears to be supportive of addressing the financial obligations of the state towards the court system. Legislative discussions are likely to center on the necessity of this study and the potential need for reform regarding how costs are allocated in state litigation. Lawmakers may view this resolution as a proactive step towards ensuring the sustainability of judicial capabilities, although detailed opinions on specific funding mechanisms and regulations may vary.
Contention
While the resolution aims to foster a constructive dialogue on court costs, there may be points of contention regarding the extent of financial support to be provided and how it might impact the broader state budget. Discussion may arise about whether the state should allocate additional resources for court expenses or seek alternative funding arrangements. Furthermore, stakeholders might offer varying perspectives on how best to balance the financial responsibilities of state agencies while ensuring the effective operation of the judicial system.
Requests the Senate Committee on Finance to study court costs in suits involving the state and political subdivisions in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court.
Provides relative to court costs in suits involving the state and state agencies in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. (2/3-CA7s2.1(A)) (8/1/24) (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Provides relative to court costs in suits involving the state and state agencies in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. (2/3 - CA7s2.1(A)) (8/1/23)
Requests a joint subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriations and Senate Committee on Finance to study and make recommendations relative to state supplemental pay (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
Authorizes the House Committee on Ways and Means, or a subcommittee thereof, to study the state's tax structure and develop recommendations for tax system reforms (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
Requests the House Committee on the Administration of Criminal Justice to study and make recommendations concerning the policies and procedures of high-speed pursuits by law enforcement officers
Requests the Senate Committee on Finance to study court costs in suits involving the state and political subdivisions in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court.