Texas Senate Bill SCR10

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Introduced: 2/2/09
• Refer: 3/13/09
• Report Pass: 4/2/09
• Refer: 4/21/09
• Report Pass: 5/7/09
• Enrolled: 5/25/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Urging Congress to provide emergency funding and resources to begin immediately addressing increasing delays at United States ports of entry on the Texas-Mexico border.

Impact

In advocating for emergency resources, SCR10 highlights the historical growth of trade between the U.S. and Mexico, particularly since the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). As the majority of U.S.-Mexico trade traverses through Texas, the resolution calls attention to the dire need for improved infrastructure that can accommodate the rising volume of commercial traffic. This aspect of the bill is particularly relevant for stakeholders reliant on efficient border operations for their economic activities, such as manufacturers and retailers who rely on just-in-time logistics.

Summary

SCR10 is a concurrent resolution urging the United States Congress to provide emergency funding and resources to address significant delays experienced at ports of entry along the Texas-Mexico border. The resolution outlines the critical role that efficient movement at these ports plays not only in economic prosperity but also in ensuring national security. With increasing congestion and delays, the resolution emphasizes the need for immediate action to enhance customs operations and facilities.

Conclusion

Ultimately, SCR10 aims to ensure that Texas ports of entry can adequately handle increasing traffic in a way that supports economic growth while maintaining security. The resolution is a call to action for Congress that underscores the importance of federal investment in state infrastructure projects that facilitate international trade.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SCR10 is the allocation of federal resources versus state control over border issues. Proponents argue for the necessity of swift federal action to improve customs operations, while opponents may raise concerns regarding long-term dependencies on federal funding and potential bureaucratic inefficiencies. Additionally, issues related to environmental impact due to idling vehicles and increased pollution levels have been raised, reflecting a balance that needs to be struck between economic efficiency and public health considerations.