Us Congress Senate Bill SJR65

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/22/25
• Refer: 7/22/25

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Approval; Florida; Revisions to Stationary Sources-Removal of Clean Air Interstate Rule Provisions".

Impact

If passed, SJR65 would effectively nullify the specific EPA rule in question, preventing its enforcement. This could lead to significant repercussions for air quality management in Florida, as it would maintain the older regulatory framework established under the Clean Air Interstate Rule. The resolution also underscores the ongoing struggle between state-level governance in environmental policy versus federal oversight, with implications for how states adapt to or resist federal regulations on air quality control.

Summary

SJR65 is a joint resolution aimed at providing congressional disapproval of an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that revises the conditions under which stationary sources in Florida are regulated under the Clean Air Interstate Rule. This resolution highlights a legislative effort to challenge the EPA's authority to amend existing environmental regulations that impact air quality standards and state compliance. The bill serves to assert congressional oversight over environmental regulations post-implementation by the EPA, which has been a contentious issue in climate policy discussions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR65 is mixed, primarily divided along party lines. Proponents of the resolution argue that it is necessary to rein in federal overreach and protect state interests regarding air quality management and the economy. They view this as a means to keep regulatory frameworks tailored to state needs. Conversely, opponents express concerns about reducing essential environmental protections that safeguard public health, arguing that the disapproval could set a precedent for weakening environmental safeguards supported by federal law.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance of power between federal agencies and state government control over environmental regulations. Supporters of SJR65 fear the restrictive impact of federal regulations on economic development and local industries, while critics argue that undermining the EPA's authority could lead to an increase in air pollution and associated health risks. The debate inherently involves the extent to which Congress should intervene in agency decisions and the long-term implications for environmental policy.