Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Impact
The proposed amendment could have substantial implications for how election offenses are prosecuted in Texas. By explicitly granting the Attorney General concurrent jurisdiction, the bill may facilitate more rigorous enforcement of election laws. This change could lead to a more centralized approach in handling election-related crimes, potentially deterring violations and ensuring that such offenses are addressed more efficiently. The resolution will be presented to Texas voters on May 2, 2026, giving the electorate the opportunity to voice their support or opposition to the amendment.
Summary
HJR1 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that specifies the authority of the Attorney General of Texas to prosecute criminal offenses related to election laws. This amendment seeks to amend Section 22 of Article IV of the Texas Constitution, clarifying the concurrent jurisdiction of the Attorney General alongside county and district attorneys in prosecuting such offenses. This proposal is significant as it aims to enhance the enforcement of election regulations at the state level, thereby addressing issues of compliance and accountability within Texas elections.
Contention
There are likely to be points of contention surrounding HJR1, particularly concerning the balance of power between state and local authorities in prosecuting election offenses. Critics might argue that empowering the Attorney General could lead to politically motivated prosecutions or an overreach of state authority into local election processes. Supporters, on the other hand, may assert that this amendment is necessary to uphold the integrity of elections and protect against fraud. As the bill progresses toward a public vote, debates regarding its implications for local governance and legal authority are expected to intensify.
Same As
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Same As
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense prescribed by the election laws of this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment specifying the authority of the attorney general to prosecute any criminal offense prescribed by the laws of this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the attorney general to prosecute a criminal offense committed by a peace officer acting in the course and scope of the officer's official duties.