Relating to certain requirements relating to the issuance of a marriage license or the recording of a declaration of informal marriage and to the maintenance of marriage and divorce indexes by the bureau of vital statistics.
Impact
The implementation of HB 898 will essentially modernize and strengthen the processes related to marriage licenses and declarations of informal marriage. By mandating the verification of the applicants' marital statuses, the bill intends to reduce cases of fraudulent marriage applications and ensure compliance with existing family law. It will also require clerks to collect fees associated with maintaining updated databases of marriages, divorces, and annulments, which may have implications for local administrative processes and budgets.
Summary
House Bill 898 aims to establish new requirements surrounding the issuance of marriage licenses and the recording of declarations of informal marriage in Texas. It emphasizes the necessity for county clerks to verify that applicants are not currently married by utilizing a state index maintained by the bureau of vital statistics. This verification process will require applicants to provide proof of prior marriage dissolution, such as a divorce decree or death certificate, ensuring that the state's laws regarding marital status are strictly maintained and followed.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 898 appears to be supportive among legislators and advocacy groups focused on family law administration. Proponents argue that the bill reflects a necessary step to protect the integrity of marriage licensing and support informed decision-making for those seeking marriage. However, there may be concerns regarding the efficacy and efficiency of implementing these checks and whether additional bureaucracy could inadvertently hinder the process for legitimate applicants.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the possible administrative burden this law could impose on county clerks, especially in counties with limited resources. There are also discussions about the ease of access for applicants who may face barriers in obtaining the required proof of prior marriage dissolution. Critics worry that these requirements could make it more difficult for individuals to enter into a new marriage, particularly for those from marginalized or less affluent backgrounds who may find it challenging to provide the necessary documentation.
Relating to the confidentiality of certain information on a marriage license, an application for a marriage license, and a declaration of informal marriage.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to the waiting period following the issuance of a marriage license and the annulment of a marriage on grounds relating to that waiting period.
Relating to the licensing of marriage and family therapists, marriage and family therapist associates, professional counselors, professional counselor associates, and social workers, including certain out-of-state applicants.
Relating to the licensing of marriage and family therapists, marriage and family therapist associates, professional counselors, professional counselor associates, and social workers, including certain out-of-state applicants.
Relating to the licensing in this state of a person licensed in another jurisdiction to practice marriage and family therapy or professional counseling.