Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB989

Filed
 
Introduced
1/28/11  
Out of House Committee
3/25/11  
Refer
2/28/11  
Voted on by House
4/6/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/10/11  
Report Pass
3/21/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/17/11  
Report Pass
3/21/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Engrossed
4/6/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Refer
4/20/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Enrolled
5/18/11  
Enrolled
5/18/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the listing of a business location of certain businesses in print advertisements or on Internet websites.

Impact

The implications of HB 989 are focused on enhancing consumer protection within the floral industry by ensuring that businesses are forthright about their actual locations. This measure is expected to help curb deceptive practices that can lead to consumer confusion and distrust. By requiring clear disclosures regarding a business’s municipal and state location, the bill aims to foster a more transparent market environment. The amendment is particularly significant for protecting smaller, local businesses that compete against larger chains that could otherwise mislead customers about their locations.

Summary

House Bill 989 amends the Texas Business and Commerce Code by establishing new regulations regarding the advertising of business locations, specifically targeting businesses that derive a significant portion of their income from floral sales. The bill prohibits businesses from misrepresenting their geographical location in print advertisements and online listings. This is aimed at ensuring consumers are accurately informed about where businesses are located, thereby protecting them from potential fraud and misrepresentation. It establishes clear definitions of what constitutes misrepresentation in this context, and outlines acceptable practices for advertising a business's geographical location.

Contention

Despite the intended consumer protections, there may be concerns among business owners regarding the compliance burdens introduced by the new regulations. Some may argue that increased regulation could stifle business operations, particularly for smaller enterprises with limited resources. Additionally, the bill excludes specific types of publishers and internet services from these regulations, raising questions about consistency in enforcement. Stakeholders may debate the balance between consumer protection and business flexibility and whether such measures serve the best interests of the market as a whole.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.