Texas Senate Bill SB537

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/7/11
• Refer: 2/17/11

Caption

Relating to the consequences of an arrest for or conviction of certain intoxication offenses.

Impact

The bill modifies existing laws concerning community supervision and intoxication offenses, particularly those outlined in the Penal Code sections 49.04 to 49.08. One notable aspect is that it mandates judges to enforce the installation of ignition interlock devices for those with heightened blood alcohol levels. Moreover, it allows courts to create payment plans for defendants who demonstrate financial hardship regarding the cost of such devices. The introduction of these requirements is expected to decrease instances of drunk driving and associated accidents by enforcing stricter rules on offenders.

Summary

SB537 introduces significant changes relating to the consequences of arrests and convictions for intoxication offenses under Texas law. It emphasizes stricter conditions for individuals placed under community supervision for such offenses, specifically mandating the installation of an ignition interlock device on their vehicles. This requirement is contingent on previous offenses and blood-alcohol concentration levels at the time of arrest. The bill aims to enhance public safety by reducing the likelihood of repeat intoxication offenses among offenders during their supervised period.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB537 appears to be supportive among advocates for stricter intoxication laws, who argue that the bill will contribute to safer roadways. Meanwhile, there are concerns regarding the fairness of imposing financial burdens on low-income individuals who might struggle to afford the ignition interlock devices. Overall, the conversations seem to reflect a desire for tougher stances on intoxication offenses while balancing fairness for offenders, particularly those who may be economically disadvantaged.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions around SB537 include its potential to disproportionately affect young offenders and those with a less stable financial situation. Critics express that the bill may not adequately address underlying issues of addiction and rehabilitation, instead focusing on punitive measures. Furthermore, the provision that allows exceptions for those operating employer-owned vehicles raises questions about accountability and the effectiveness of the law across different socio-economic groups.