Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB737

Filed
 
Introduced
2/16/11  
Out of Senate Committee
3/28/11  
Voted on by Senate
3/30/11  
Refer
2/23/11  
Out of House Committee
4/12/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  
Voted on by House
4/14/11  
Engrossed
3/30/11  
Governor Action
4/29/11  
Refer
4/4/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Enrolled
4/18/11  
Enrolled
4/18/11  
Passed
4/29/11  

Caption

Relating to the management of groundwater production by groundwater conservation districts.

Impact

The implications of SB737 are significant for state laws concerning natural resource management, especially in relation to agriculture and environmental protection. By formalizing the process for managing groundwater and including provisions for forecasting and monitoring usage, the bill seeks to mitigate issues associated with over-extraction and depletion of groundwater sources. The requirement for districts to submit management plans to the executive administrator further consolidates oversight and aims to promote better coordination among water management entities across the state.

Summary

SB737 focuses on the management of groundwater production by groundwater conservation districts in Texas. The bill amends several sections of the Water Code to ensure that groundwater resources are managed effectively and sustainably. It establishes criteria regarding the 'modeled available groundwater' and mandates districts to determine the permissible water production levels based on predefined standards and goals for groundwater sustainability. Furthermore, the bill outlines specific procedures and considerations for issuing permits for groundwater usage, which aim to balance current and projected demand with the ecological integrity of groundwater supplies.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its forward-looking approach to groundwater management, notable points of contention have emerged during discussions. Advocates for agricultural interests worry about the potential limitations on groundwater access that could adversely affect farming operations, particularly in areas reliant on groundwater for irrigation. Additionally, environmental groups have raised concerns regarding the balance between permitting processes and natural resource conservation, emphasizing the need for stringent sustainability criteria to protect vital ecosystems reliant on groundwater recharge.

Companion Bills

TX HB1824

Identical Relating to the management of groundwater production by groundwater conservation districts.

Similar Bills

CA SB193

Monterey County Water Resources Agency: Lake Nacimiento and Lake San Antonio: white bass.

CA AB1757

California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: climate goal: natural and working lands.

TX HB836

Relating to the development of brackish groundwater.

CA SB963

Water replenishment districts.

AZ SB1041

Groundwater savings certificate; assured water

CA SB372

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

TX SB1392

Relating to groundwater conservation districts.

CA AB1044

Tulare Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency Act.