Texas House Bill HB2217

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/4/11
• Refer: 3/10/11

Caption

Relating to the essential knowledge and skills of the social studies curriculum used in the public schools.

Impact

The passage of HB 2217 would significantly alter the framework through which social studies education is delivered in Texas schools. By nullifying the 2010 guidelines, the bill essentially halts the previously set standards and expresses a need for re-evaluation. This action could impact the overall quality and consistency of social studies education across the state as it navigates the transition to new standards that might emerge following the impending review.

Summary

House Bill 2217 aims to amend the essential knowledge and skills for the social studies curriculum utilized in Texas public schools. The bill seeks to invalidate the social studies standards adopted by the State Board of Education in 2010 and prohibits the board from producing textbooks based on those standards or requiring school districts to use them in instruction. Instead, the bill mandates a new review of social studies standards to be initiated by the board, pending which schools will continue to teach based on the standards in effect during the 2010-2011 academic year.

Sentiment

There appears to be a mixed sentiment regarding HB 2217. Supporters of the bill may view it as an opportunity to address perceived deficiencies in the previous social studies guidelines and align the curriculum with contemporary educational needs. However, there could be apprehension from critics who might regard the bill as a step backward, introducing uncertainty into the curriculum and conflicting with established educational plans that schools have been implementing, potentially affecting teachers and students alike.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 2217 include debates over the merits of the previous social studies curriculum and the process through which educational standards should be updated. Critics may argue that delaying the implementation of a stable curriculum creates chaos in classrooms, while proponents might suggest that the revision is necessary to infuse more relevant and engaging content into social studies education. The bill’s potential to affect textbook production processes and instructional methods can stir discussions about state versus local control in education.