Texas Senate Bill SB1909

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Refer: 4/18/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/29/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/5/11
• Report Pass: 4/29/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 5/5/11
• Voted on by House: 5/24/11
• Refer: 5/9/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Report Pass: 5/19/11
• Introduced: 5/19/11
• Enrolled: 5/27/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to The University of Texas at Brownsville, including its partnership agreement with the Texas Southmost College District.

Impact

The primary impact of SB1909 on state law is the amendment of certain sections of the Education Code, specifically regarding the operations and governance of these two educational entities. The bill introduces a clearer framework for collaboration without the necessity of an overarching partnership agreement, thereby promoting autonomy for both institutions. This change is expected to streamline administrative processes, allowing each entity to pursue its educational goals more effectively while still potentially engaging in cooperative agreements when beneficial.

Summary

SB1909 is a legislative act that aims to modify the operational framework for The University of Texas at Brownsville and its partnership with the Texas Southmost College District. The bill outlines provisions for agreements between these institutions to facilitate higher education objectives, particularly aimed at improving student transition from Texas Southmost College to The University of Texas at Brownsville. A central focus of the bill is ensuring that the institutions can remain independent and self-sufficient while still maintaining a collaborative relationship as needed.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding SB1909 includes concerns over the implications of breaking formal partnerships, with some stakeholders advocating for the benefits of maintaining such collaborations for resource sharing and educational continuity. There is apprehension whether disbanding formal arrangements might lead to diminished support for programs or reduction in accreditation needs. However, proponents of the bill argue that independence could foster innovation and specialized programs tailored to community needs without the constraints of a partnership framework.