Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3311

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
4/20/11  
Introduced
3/11/11  
Voted on by House
5/5/11  
Refer
3/18/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/18/11  
Report Pass
4/11/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/24/11  
Engrossed
5/5/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
5/9/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/25/11  
Enrolled
5/25/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the duty of an attorney ad litem appointed for a child to meet with the child or individual with whom the child resides before each court hearing.

Impact

The enactment of HB 3311 is expected to have a significant impact on family law practice in Texas, particularly in cases involving minors. By mandating meetings between attorneys and children, the bill reinforces the importance of understanding the child's perspective in legal matters that affect them directly. This change could improve the quality of representation for children, ensuring that their interests are more prominently featured during court hearings. The bill also emphasizes the need for confidentiality, which is crucial in fostering trust between children and their legal representatives.

Summary

House Bill 3311 aims to enhance the representation of children in family law cases by requiring that attorneys ad litem meet with their child clients or the individuals with whom they reside prior to each court hearing. This meeting is designed to take place with ample time to prepare for the hearing and in a private setting to facilitate confidential communication. This legislative change seeks to ensure that the child's voice and preferences are adequately conveyed in legal proceedings, aligning the attorney's preparation with the child's expressed objectives of representation.

Contention

While there may not have been significant opposition noted in the legislative processes, a potential area of contention could arise from the implications of the required meetings on legal costs and case timelines. Some attorneys might express concerns about the additional time and resources required to conduct these meetings regularly, particularly in a system already under pressure from backlogs in family court cases. Nonetheless, supporters argue that the long-term benefits of improved child representation and outcomes justify these adjustments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.