Texas 2011 - 82nd 1st C.S.

Texas Senate Bill SJR3

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Sent toSOS
 
Proposed Const. Amend.
 

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the periodic review of state and local tax preferences and providing an expiration date for certain tax preferences.

Impact

If approved, SJR3 would significantly alter how tax preferences are managed within the state. It would require that the legislature take a proactive role in examining existing and new tax preferences, potentially leading to the removal of those deemed ineffective or unnecessary. This legislative oversight could foster a more equitable tax environment, as preferences that no longer serve their intended purpose would be eliminated. Consequently, it could also redirect revenue flows back into essential state and local services that benefit residents.

Summary

SJR3 proposes a constitutional amendment aimed at enhancing the transparency and accountability of state and local tax preferences. This bill mandates a periodic review of such tax preferences and establishes an expiration date of six years from the effective date for any tax preferences that are enacted after September 1, 2012. The primary objective of SJR3 is to ensure that tax preferences are assessed regularly to determine their relevance and impact, thus promoting responsible fiscal policy in Texas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR3 appears to be largely positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step toward fiscal responsibility and accountability. Supporters argue that periodic reviews would prevent the accumulation of outdated or ineffective tax breaks that could hinder state revenue. However, there may also be concerns from certain groups about the potential loss of beneficial tax incentives that help stimulate economic growth or support specific industries.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SJR3 might revolve around the potential impact of expiration dates on tax preferences that play a crucial role in local economies. Critics may argue that automatic expirations could undermine business planning and investment strategies by creating uncertainty. Additionally, there may be fears that regular reviews could lead to the elimination of tax breaks that are essential for certain sectors, particularly those that foster job creation or economic development.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.