Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB20

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to prosecution and punishment for the offense of official oppression by the intrusive touching of persons seeking access to public buildings and transportation; providing penalties.

Impact

If enacted, SB20 will have a significant influence on existing state laws regarding transportation funding and infrastructure development. Specifically, it aims to streamline the processes involved in emergency response-related improvements. This could ultimately lead to more rapid deployment of resources and enhance the overall response capabilities of state and local agencies. The proposed changes may also encourage collaboration between various departments and agencies involved in managing public safety and infrastructure.

Summary

Senate Bill 20 (SB20) focuses on enhancing the state's transportation infrastructure, particularly in emergency response situations. The bill proposes measures to allocate state funds for upgrading roads and transportation networks that are crucial during crises, aiming to improve accessibility and efficiency in emergency situations. It emphasizes the importance of timely and effective transportation to ensure public safety and swift first responder actions during disasters or emergencies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB20 appears generally positive among lawmakers and emergency management professionals. Proponents argue that the investment in transportation infrastructure is crucial for maintaining public safety and enhancing emergency response strategies. However, some community members expressed concerns regarding the balance of funding allocations, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in how the funds are utilized, particularly in underfunded areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB20 include discussions on the allocation of funding and the prioritization of specific projects. Opponents have raised concerns about potential favoritism in project selection, fearing that rural areas may not receive the same level of attention as urban centers. Additionally, there are discussions about the long-term sustainability of the proposed infrastructure improvements and whether they align with broader environmental and transportation goals.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.