Texas House Bill HCR66

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Inviting the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Texas to address a joint session of the legislature on March 6, 2013.

Impact

While HCR66 itself is primarily an invitation rather than a bill with legislative impact, its significance lies in the broader context of judiciary accountability and transparency. By facilitating a direct address from the Chief Justice, the resolution underscores the importance of communication between the judicial branch and the legislative body. It aims to ensure that legislative members are informed about the operational status of courts and any challenges they may face, particularly concerning accessibility for citizens.

Summary

HCR66 is a concurrent resolution from the 83rd Texas Legislature that invites Chief Justice Wallace B. Jefferson to address a joint session of the legislature regarding the state of the judiciary in Texas. Specifically, it relates to the requirements set forth in Section 21.004(a) of the Government Code, compelling the Chief Justice to evaluate court accessibility and the future demands of the judiciary. The resolution is scheduled for a joint session on March 6, 2013, at 11:00 a.m., in the Hall of the House of Representatives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR66 appears to be neutral to positive, as it reflects a legislative interest in the judiciary's functioning and the acknowledgment of the judiciary's role in upholding the law. The request for a direct address suggests a willingness among lawmakers to engage with judicial leadership and participate in discussions about necessary reforms or updates in the judicial process.

Contention

Though the resolution does not present points of contention like traditional bills may, it does highlight the ongoing dialogue regarding court accessibility and judicial needs in the state of Texas. Discussions may arise from the content and implications of the Chief Justice's address, particularly regarding funding for the courts, potential reforms, and the judiciary's workload, which could lead to varying opinions among legislators.