Texas Senate Bill SB550

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to requiring dental support for a child subject to a child support order.

Impact

If enacted, SB550 will revise the Family Code to integrate dental support within child support obligations, thus formalizing the requirement for dental insurance as part of child support arrangements. The legislation is set to simplify and clarify the existing laws, making it easier for custodial parents and state agencies to enforce these obligations. Furthermore, it establishes that dental insurance can no longer be overlooked in family law cases where child support is assessed. This change would aim at improving children's access to dental healthcare services throughout Texas.

Summary

SB550 aims to revise the Child Support provisions under Texas Family Code by explicitly requiring dental support alongside existing medical support obligations for children. This bill recognizes the importance of dental care as part of a child's overall healthcare needs and seeks to ensure that parents fulfill their obligations to provide adequate health and dental insurance. The proposed changes include definitions for 'dental support' and 'dental insurance,' ensuring that such coverage is mandated when determining a child support order.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB550 appears to be largely constructive, with support from various advocacy groups and stakeholders who emphasize the necessity of comprehensive health coverage for children. Proponents argue that dental health directly impacts children's overall health and academic performance, and thus the law should reflect this necessity. However, some concerns may arise regarding the financial implications for parents who may find it challenging to afford additional premiums resulting from the new requirements, sparking a dialogue around family financial responsibilities.

Contention

While the bill is seen as a significant enhancement to children's rights to healthcare, there may be points of contention regarding the practical enforcement of new obligations. Critics could argue about the potential for increased burdens on parents, especially non-custodial ones, who may already be stretched thin financially. This reflects broader societal concerns about affordability and access to health and dental services, making community feedback essential as the bill moves through the legislative process.