Relating to excluding certain students from the computation of dropout and completion rates for purposes of public school accountability.
Impact
The implications of SB1170 are substantial, as it would alter established funding formulas and potentially divert funds from traditional public schools to private and charter schools. Critics of the bill express concerns about the impact on public school funding, suggesting that it may exacerbate inequalities within the education system. These opponents argue that the bill primarily benefits affluent families who can afford to supplement educational options while undermining the resources available for public schools serving lower-income communities.
Summary
SB1170 proposes significant changes to the funding mechanisms for public education in the state. The bill emphasizes increased funding for school choice initiatives, allowing parents greater flexibility in selecting educational institutions for their children. Proponents of the bill argue that providing more funding for school choice will enhance competition among schools, leading to better overall educational outcomes for students. They believe that empowering parents with more options will cater to diverse learning needs and improve accountability in schools.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB1170 is notably contentious, with strong opinions on both sides. Supporters view the bill as a necessary reform to foster competition and improve educational standards across the state, while opponents perceive it as a move toward privatizing education and diminishing the quality of public schooling. This polarized sentiment reflects a broader national debate on the role of school choice and the adequacy of public education funding.
Contention
One of the main points of contention regarding SB1170 is its potential to shift focus away from public school systems, which serve the majority of students. Critics warn that the bill may lead to resource depletion for these public institutions, thereby affecting teachers, staff, and students negatively. Furthermore, there are concerns about the accountability measures in place for the newly funded school choice options, with opponents insisting that oversight is essential to ensure quality education regardless of the institution type.
Relating to eliminating the requirement to use public school assessment instruments as indicators of achievement under the public school accountability system.