Texas House Bill HB648

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

• Filed: 12/19/16

Caption

Relating to the effect of certain agreements with a collective bargaining organization on certain state-funded public work contracts.

Impact

The bill's enactment would affect the way public work contracts are managed at both the state and local levels. By not allowing governmental entities to discriminate against contractors based on their participation in collective bargaining agreements, HB648 seeks to enhance bidder equality and reduce potential biases in the awarding of contracts. It also clarifies the compliance with the National Labor Relations Act, maintaining the protections already offered by federal labor laws.

Summary

House Bill 648 focuses on the implications of agreements between contractors and collective bargaining organizations for public work contracts funded by the state of Texas. The bill establishes that entities awarding these contracts cannot require or prohibit involvement in such agreements, nor discriminate based on a contractor's relationship with a collective bargaining organization. This move aims to ensure a fair bidding environment for contractors regardless of their union affiliations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB648 appears to be supportive among labor advocates and unions who appreciate the bill's emphasis on non-discrimination and equal opportunity for contractors. However, there may be apprehension among some policymakers and business groups concerned that it could limit financial flexibility or operational autonomy in deciding contract terms. Overall, the bill has sparked discussion about the balance between labor rights and public procurement processes.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the stringent adherence to non-discrimination in contractor agreements. Critics may argue that by preventing entities from requiring or prohibiting collective bargaining agreements, it could complicate the administration of public contracts and the relationships between contractors and local governance. The implications of the bill for state-funded public projects and the control it affords to contractors in their dealings with unions has been a topic of debate amongst stakeholders.