Massachusetts House Bill H1070

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23

Caption

Relative to secure choice retirement savings plan

Impact

The introduction of this bill will reshape state laws governing retirement savings and employer responsibilities. It requires eligible employers to enroll their workers in the Secure Choice Individual Retirement Account Program (IRAP) unless they already provide a qualified retirement plan. The bill also establishes the Secure Choice Multiple-Employer Retirement Account Program (MERP) which permits multiple employers to jointly create a retirement plan, thereby increasing accessibility for smaller businesses. This dual approach intends to create a wider safety net for different types of workers in the state, promoting greater financial security during retirement.

Summary

House Bill 1070 aims to establish a 'Secure Choice Retirement Savings Plan' in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, enabling eligible employees to contribute to individual retirement accounts through automatic payroll deductions. The bill stipulates that participating employees will be automatically enrolled in the program unless they opt out. This initiative is targeted toward individuals who typically lack access to retirement savings options, thereby enhancing financial security and promoting saving habits among employees with limited retirement plan offerings through their employers. The proposed legislation mirrors similar programs in other states and is seen as a vital step towards improving statewide retirement readiness.

Contention

Debate around H1070 may arise regarding the responsibilities imposed on employers, especially in terms of operational logistics and potential liability. Some businesses may express concerns about the automatic enrollment provisions and the implications for existing retirement offerings. Moreover, there may be discussions concerning the nature of employer contributions and how these will be administered. Opponents of the bill might argue that mandates on businesses could place unnecessary burdens on small enterprises, while proponents will argue it is necessary for fostering a culture of savings among employees.