To improve outdoor and indoor air quality for communities burdened by pollution
The bill introduces several requirements for building permits, stipulating that no construction for certain types of facilities, including schools and hospitals, shall proceed without satisfactory mitigation measures for air pollutants, particularly ultrafine particulate matter and black carbon. It mandates the use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and MERV 16 filters in mechanical systems, aiming to reduce the concentration of particulate matter to levels substantially below those found outdoors. An advisory committee comprising local residents, academics, and labor representatives would be created to identify communities heavily impacted by air pollution, ensuring they receive adequate oversight and resources.
House Bill 2131, titled 'An Act to improve outdoor and indoor air quality for communities burdened by pollution,' aims to enhance the quality of air across various sectors by addressing pollution. The bill encompasses amendments to several chapters of the Massachusetts General Laws, focused on the management of indoor and outdoor air quality in residential and commercial buildings, particularly those near pollution sources like highways. To support its objectives, the bill establishes definitions for key terms such as 'black carbon' and 'fine particulate matter,' and mandates assessments for air pollutants in specific environments, emphasizing the need to mitigate exposure among vulnerable populations.
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 2131 involve the implications of the new regulations on construction and public health; while proponents argue that these measures are critical for protecting community health, particularly among environmental justice populations, critics express concerns about the potential burdens placed on developers and property owners. The stringent requirements for air quality assessments and building permits could delay projects and increase costs. Additionally, some stakeholders may question the feasibility of implementing such comprehensive assessments and the state's ability to enforce compliance effectively.