1 | 1 | | 1 of 2 |
---|
2 | 2 | | HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 5082 FILED ON: 5/1/2024 |
---|
3 | 3 | | HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 4615 |
---|
4 | 4 | | OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR |
---|
5 | 5 | | COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS |
---|
6 | 6 | | STATE HOUSE · BOSTON, MA 02133 |
---|
7 | 7 | | (617) 725-4000 |
---|
8 | 8 | | MAURA T. HEALEY |
---|
9 | 9 | | GOVERNOR |
---|
10 | 10 | | KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL |
---|
11 | 11 | | LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR |
---|
12 | 12 | | May 1, 2024 |
---|
13 | 13 | | To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives, |
---|
14 | 14 | | Pursuant to Article LVI, as amended by Article XC, Section 3 of the Amendments to the |
---|
15 | 15 | | Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, I am returning to you for amendment |
---|
16 | 16 | | House Bill 3911, “An Act authorizing the town of Lunenburg to establish a means tested senior |
---|
17 | 17 | | citizen property tax exemption.” |
---|
18 | 18 | | I am returning this bill for amendment due to an apparent scrivener’s error. In May 2023, |
---|
19 | 19 | | the Annual Town Meeting in the Town of Lunenburg voted to authorize the filing of a Home |
---|
20 | 20 | | Rule petition to establish a means-tested property tax exemption for certain senior citizens. |
---|
21 | 21 | | Before doing so, the Town Meeting considered how to allocate the cost of this new exemption. |
---|
22 | 22 | | In particular, the Town Meeting considered, but chose to reject, petition language that would |
---|
23 | 23 | | have allocated the cost of the new exemption to other residential taxpayers alone. Instead, the |
---|
24 | 24 | | Town Meeting voted to advance a petition calling for the exemption to be allocated |
---|
25 | 25 | | proportionally within the tax levy on all property taxpayers, regardless of classification. |
---|
26 | 26 | | Consistent with the intent of the Town Meeting, Section 3 of House Bill 3911 provides: |
---|
27 | 27 | | “The total amount exempted by this act shall be allocated proportionally within the tax levy on |
---|
28 | 28 | | all taxpayers and shall not exceed 1 per cent of the town-wide real property taxy levy.” |
---|
29 | 29 | | (Emphasis added). Section 5, however, provides: “No exemption shall be granted . . . until the |
---|
30 | 30 | | department of revenue certifies a residential tax rate for the applicable tax year where the total |
---|
31 | 31 | | exemption amount is raised by a burden shift within the residential tax levy.” (Emphasis added). |
---|
32 | 32 | | These two sections of the bill are in conflict; Section 3 requires that the exemption be allocated |
---|
33 | 33 | | to all property taxpayers but Section 5 requires it to be allocated to residential taxpayers alone. If |
---|
34 | 34 | | I signed the bill as is, this conflict would preclude the new means-tested property tax exemption |
---|
35 | 35 | | from going into effect. 2 of 2 |
---|
36 | 36 | | For these reasons, and to accomplish the intent of the Town Meeting, I recommend that |
---|
37 | 37 | | the bill be amended by striking out section 5 and inserting in place thereof the following section:- |
---|
38 | 38 | | Section 5. No exemption shall be granted under this act until the department of revenue |
---|
39 | 39 | | certifies a tax rate or rates for the applicable tax year where the total exemption amount is raised |
---|
40 | 40 | | by a burden shift within the tax levy on all taxpayers. |
---|
41 | 41 | | To correct a typographical error, I further recommend striking out, in line 19, the word |
---|
42 | 42 | | “Luneburg” and inserting place thereof:- “Lunenburg” |
---|
43 | 43 | | Respectfully submitted, |
---|
44 | 44 | | Maura T. Healey, |
---|
45 | 45 | | Governor |
---|