The implementation of H85 could significantly enhance the availability of internet services for residents living on private ways, which often face challenges in accessing telecommunication infrastructure. By classifying internet service installations similarly to telephone installations, local municipalities and utility companies may be more compelled to provide these essential services, ensuring that residents are not left without crucial access due to their location. This change in the law could also propel further investment into broadband services, particularly in rural or underserved areas.
Summary
House Bill H85 aims to amend Chapter 187 of the General Laws in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to facilitate internet access on private ways. Specifically, the bill seeks to insert the term 'internet' after every mention of 'telephone' within the legislation. By doing so, the legislation recognizes internet services as equivalent to traditional telephone services in the context of installation duties on private roads. This amendment reflects the increasing importance of internet connectivity in contemporary society and acknowledges the need for equitable access to such services in both public and private domains.
Contention
Despite the positive implications intended by H85, potential contention may arise around the practical enforcement of the new provisions. There are questions about how local governments will interpret and enforce the terms of the bill, especially regarding the rights of private property owners and the responsibilities of service providers. Additionally, stakeholders may express concerns about the costs associated with installing internet infrastructure and whether these costs will be passed on to residents. As broadband expansion continues to be a topic of debate, the balancing of interests among service providers, property rights, and community access remains a critical point of discussion.