Massachusetts Senate Bill S1175

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Refer: 1/29/24

Caption

To increase unemployment insurance benefits for low wage workers

Impact

The bill specifically revises provisions regarding the calculation of weekly unemployment benefits. Under the new framework, eligible individuals would receive up to fifty percent of their average weekly wage, rounded to the nearest full dollar amount, ensuring that they are supported adequately during periods of unemployment. This amendment is particularly beneficial in a climate of rising living costs, aiming to make it easier for low wage workers to maintain their livelihoods while searching for new employment opportunities.

Summary

Senate Bill S1175 aims to increase unemployment insurance benefits for low wage workers in Massachusetts. The proposed legislation revises certain sections of Chapter 151A of the General Laws by adjusting how benefits are calculated and establishing more favorable terms for unemployed individuals. It seeks to amend the thresholds for determining qualifying income and benefits, thereby providing a more significant safety net for workers who, due to economic conditions or other factors, find themselves without work.

Contention

During discussions surrounding S1175, there were some concerns expressed regarding the sustainability of funding these increased benefits. Opponents raised issues about potential increases in unemployment insurance taxes on businesses, which could lead to a burdensome economic environment for employers. Supporters, however, argued that the increased benefits are necessary to support working-class individuals and stimulate economic recovery by ensuring that they have access to adequate financial assistance during unemployment.

Notable_points

Another point of contention emerged regarding the effectiveness of increased benefits in actually addressing unemployment rates versus the cost involved in implementing such changes. While proponents of S1175 advocate that this increase is essential for alleviating poverty among low wage workers, critics questioned how it would influence employment statistics and the behavior of employers facing increased costs.