Massachusetts Senate Bill S1513

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23

Caption

Prohibiting the confiscation of lawfully owned firearms during a state of emergency

Impact

If passed, S1513 would amend Chapter 140 of the General Laws by introducing Section 129E, which would solidify the inability of law enforcement officials to seize lawfully owned firearms under emergency conditions. The bill intends to prevent potential overreach by the government, reflecting a strong emphasis on Second Amendment rights. It also includes provisions for civil fines for those who violate these stipulations, with penalties ranging from $500 to $5,000 per unlawfully confiscated firearm, or imprisonment for up to two and a half years.

Summary

Senate Bill S1513 aims to prohibit the confiscation of lawfully owned firearms during a declared state of emergency in Massachusetts. The bill stipulates that no government officials or individuals acting on their behalf are permitted to confiscate legally owned firearms, rifles, shotguns, machine guns, or ammunition. This legislative action is framed within the broader context of safeguarding the rights of gun owners and ensuring that during times of crisis, individuals retain their property rights regarding firearms.

Contention

The bill may generate significant discussion among legislators, gun rights advocates, and law enforcement agencies. Proponents argue that the measure is essential to protect individual freedoms and ensure citizens can defend themselves during emergencies. Conversely, opponents might raise concerns about the implications for public safety and the potential challenges it poses to law enforcement's ability to manage firearms effectively in crisis situations. The debate is likely to center on the balance between individual rights and community safety.

Notable_points

An important aspect of S1513 is that it does not prohibit confiscation of firearms from individuals who are arrested or have been issued protection orders. This inclusion aims to address potential concerns about dangerous individuals retaining access to firearms while still maintaining broader protections for law-abiding gun owners. The discussion surrounding this provision could be pivotal in shaping the final outcome of the bill.