Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

Massachusetts Senate Bill S1692

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/16/23  

Caption

Relative to residency

Impact

The primary impact of S1692 is on local hiring practices and public safety department employment terms across Massachusetts. The bill seeks to create a standardized approach to residency that ensures public safety personnel are closer to the communities they serve. This proximity may enhance response times and community engagement. However, it also introduces the flexibility for municipalities to negotiate terms that could impact the attractiveness of these positions for potential candidates depending on the cost of living and housing market in close proximity to their workplaces.

Summary

Bill S1692, introduced in the Massachusetts legislature, aims to amend existing residency requirements for members of the regular police and fire departments. The bill proposes that any member hired after August 1, 1978, who is not subject to chapter 31 of the General Laws, must reside within fifteen miles of the city or town where they are employed. This distance is measured from the closest boundary of the municipality to the closest boundary of the member's residence. Additionally, it allows individual cities or towns the discretion to expand the fifteen-mile residency limit through collective bargaining agreements, potentially leading to localized variations in residency rules.

Contention

As with many legislative proposals regarding residency requirements, S1692 is likely to spark debates concerning fairness and practicality. Supporters argue that local residency is critical for fostering community relationships and ensuring that public safety personnel are readily available in emergencies. On the other hand, opponents may raise concerns regarding the potential limitation of the candidate pool for these positions, as requiring residency within a specific area could disproportionately affect individuals who may live further away due to personal circumstances, cost of living, or family obligations. The provision for collective bargaining may also lead to inconsistencies across different municipalities, causing disparities in how residency applies to members of the police and fire services.

Companion Bills

MA S2317

Similar To Relative to age restrictions for veterans applying to be police officers and firefighters

MA S1749

Similar To Relative to accidental disability retirement for police officers and firefighters

Previously Filed As

MA H2541

Relative to residency

MA H2260

Relative to firefighter residency

MA S1449

Relative to firefighter residency

MA H2335

Extending residency requirements for members of the regular police or fire departments and fire alarm division of the city of Newton

MA H5085

Extending residency requirements for members of the regular police or fire departments and fire alarm division of the city of Newton

MA S1194

Relative to transparency in employee benefits reporting in private construction

MA H2657

Authorizing the town of Acton to increase the residency limit for members of its police and fire departments

MA H4168

Authorizing the town of Acton to increase the residency limit for members of its police and fire departments

MA H2019

To increase kennel safety, aka Ollie’s Law

MA H1230

Mandating access to cancer screenings for firefighters through health care benefits plans or programs provided by the public employer

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.