Massachusetts Senate Bill S2319

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 3/14/24
• Refer: 3/14/24

Caption

Resolutions for a United States Constitutional Amendment and a limited amendment proposing convention

Impact

If enacted, S2319 would direct Congress to propose an amendment affirming that only natural persons possess Constitutional rights. This significant shift could fundamentally alter how corporations interact with federal and state laws, particularly regarding political contributions. The resolution emphasizes the need for state control over election integrity measures and seeks to engage in a broader dialogue with other states about similar concerns. It signifies an important step towards strengthening the legislative power of states in the face of federal judicial decisions that have a profound impact on elections nationwide.

Summary

S2319 is a resolution introduced in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with the intent of calling for a United States Constitutional Amendment to address issues arising from the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. FEC. This ruling removed previously imposed restrictions on political spending and has led to significant concerns about the influence of large corporations and financial interests in elections. Through this bill, Massachusetts aims to ensure that political contributions are limited and that the rights protected under the Constitution are reserved for natural persons only, thereby preventing corporations from exerting undue influence in the political process.

Contention

The key points of contention surrounding S2319 revolve around its implications for corporate influence in politics and the foundational principles of democracy. Supporters argue that the amendment is essential to restoring fair elections and preventing the manipulation of the political landscape by powerful economic entities. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the potential restrictions on free speech associated with limiting funding in political campaigns. Furthermore, the resolution seeks to initiate a convention limited to discussing these amendments, which some may view as a dangerous precedent that could lead to broader modifications of the Constitution.