Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

Massachusetts Senate Bill S715

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/16/23  

Caption

To ensure access to prescription medications

Impact

The introduction of this bill is expected to significantly impact state laws governing pharmacy benefit management and drug pricing. It aims to limit the power of PBMs by enforcing maximum allowable costs that are transparent and equitable, alongside a defined process for pharmacies to contest prices set by PBMs. Furthermore, by obligating PBMs to update their maximum allowable cost lists consistently and ensuring that these costs align with the pharmacies' acquisition costs, the bill intends to improve financial predictability for pharmacies. This transparency may lead to more competitive pricing and better access to medications for patients across Massachusetts.

Summary

Bill S715, titled 'An Act to ensure access to prescription medications,' aims to address various issues related to the pricing of drugs and the role of pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) in the reimbursement process. The bill proposes amendments to Chapter 176D of the Massachusetts General Laws, introducing a 'maximum allowable cost list' for drugs and medical products that pharmacy benefits managers or covered entities must adhere to when determining reimbursements. It establishes a framework to ensure that pharmacies are reimbursed fairly for the medications they provide, guaranteeing that the maximum allowable cost is at least equal to the acquisition cost for covered medications.

Conclusion

Overall, S715 seeks to address critical issues in pharmaceutical access and pricing, with the aim of creating a more equitable environment for pharmacies and patients alike. As discussions move forward, key stakeholders will need to evaluate the bill's provisions to ensure that they not only protect consumers' interests but also maintain the viability of pharmacy benefit management structures.

Contention

Nonetheless, the bill may face challenges and points of contention within the legislature. Proponents argue that these changes will combat the prevalent issue of rising drug prices and improve access for patients needing medications. On the other hand, opponents may raise concerns about the potential for increased operational burdens on pharmacy benefits managers, which could ultimately affect the overall healthcare system dynamics. Additionally, there may be debates surrounding the implications of these changes on smaller pharmacies and their ability to remain afloat amidst enforced pricing structures.

Companion Bills

MA S1369

Similar To To establish a pilot program for specialty pharmacy in urology

MA S670

Similar To To help patients and reduce healthcare costs by ensuring patient adherence to medications

MA S2492

Similar To Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA S2499

Similar To Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA S2520

Similar To Relative to pharmaceutical access, costs and transparency

MA H4634

Replaced by Study Order

Similar Bills

LA HB432

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations (OR +$88,000 SG EX See Note)

LA HB387

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations

AR SB593

To Amend The Arkansas Pharmacy Benefits Manager Licensure Act; And To Create The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act.

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

AR SB475

To Establish The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act; And To Regulate Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations.

CA SB966

Pharmacy benefits.

AR SB544

To Amend The Arkansas Pharmacy Benefits Manager Licensure Act.

HI SB602

Relating To Pharmacy Benefit Managers.