Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

Massachusetts Senate Bill S869

Introduced
2/16/23  

Caption

To reduce the financial barriers to renting homes

Impact

The passage of S869 would amend section 15B of chapter 186 of the General Laws of Massachusetts, reforming the payment structures associated with new tenancies. The legislation is designed to protect tenants from excessive upfront fees which can be significant barriers to securing rental housing. This reform could facilitate a more equitable housing landscape by enabling more individuals to access rental units without being financially burdened right at the start. Such legislative changes are particularly timely in a climate where housing affordability is a pressing concern across many urban areas in Massachusetts.

Summary

Bill S869, introduced by Senator James B. Eldridge, aims to reduce the financial barriers faced by tenants when renting homes in Massachusetts. The bill specifically modifies the requirements that landlords can impose on prospective tenants. It establishes clearer guidelines regarding the initial costs that tenants can be asked to pay before starting a tenancy, thus making the renting process more accessible to individuals with varied financial situations. By limiting upfront costs, the bill seeks to support affordability and fairness in the housing market, addressing issues that disproportionately affect lower-income renters.

Conclusion

Overall, Bill S869 represents a significant move toward increasing tenant protections and addressing the challenges of housing affordability. Should the bill advance, it will be crucial to monitor not only its implementation but also its long-term effects on both tenants and landlords within the Massachusetts housing market.

Contention

While many stakeholders may support the protective measures for tenants introduced by S869, there might be contention from landlord associations and real estate groups who may argue that such restrictions could limit their ability to manage their properties effectively. Critics of the bill could raise concerns about potential impacts on the rental market, suggesting that capping initial fees might lead to landlords increasing rent or implementing other fees to compensate for lost revenue. Furthermore, there may be discussions surrounding how these changes will be enforced and the potential for unintended consequences in the rental market.

Companion Bills

MA H4707

Similar To Relative to the Affordable Homes Act

MA H4880

Similar To Relative to the expansion of a branch of the Boston Public Library within an affordable housing development in the West End Neighborhood of the downtown sections of the city of Boston

MA S2875

Similar To Similar Bills

MA S2977

Similar To To increase housing production in the city of Lowell

MA H5035

Replaced by Study Order

Previously Filed As

MA S659

Relative to removing barriers to non-opioid pain management

MA H2254

Reducing barriers to telehealth care

MA S1253

To remove administrative barriers to behavioral health services

MA H1316

Relative to reducing barriers to housing

MA S984

To further regulate tenant fees in rental housing

MA H438

To reduce barriers to education and career opportunities

MA S2116

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions by permitting local option all-electric buildings and homes ordinances

MA H1434

Reducing barriers to employment through credit discrimination

MA S1004

To create affordable homes for persons with disabilities

MA H1481

To create affordable homes for persons with disabilities

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.