The intended impact of S901 is significant, as it seeks to prevent scenarios where affordable housing stock could be converted to market rate at a later date. By mandating that such housing remain affordable indefinitely, legislators aim to curb the trend of gentrification and the associated displacement of low-income households. This bill could also influence developers and municipal planning by making clear that affordability is a permanent requirement for certain housing projects.
Summary
Senate Bill 901 proposes an amendment to Chapter 40B of the General Laws of Massachusetts to ensure that all low or moderate-income housing constructed under a comprehensive permit remains affordable in perpetuity. This bill is part of a broader legislative effort to address housing challenges in the Commonwealth by solidifying the commitment to affordable housing, thereby providing long-term stability for residents who rely on such housing options.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding this bill include discussions on the definition of 'affordability' and how it is measured over time, particularly in response to market fluctuations. Critics may argue that strict affordability requirements could deter developers from undertaking projects in the first place, potentially leading to a decrease in overall housing availability. As similar legislation has been introduced in previous sessions, there are recurring debates on the balance between encouraging development and preserving affordable housing, reflecting broader concerns within housing policy.