Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H191

Introduced
2/27/25  

Caption

Relative to limiting the potency of THC products

Impact

The implications of HB 191 extend to the retail cannabis industry in Massachusetts, aiming to promote safer consumption practices in recreational marijuana use. By regulating the potency of THC products sold, the bill attempts to address concerns over potential health risks associated with high-potency marijuana products and to enhance consumer awareness and safety. Establishing limits on THC content could benefit public health by reducing the likelihood of overconsumption and associated adverse effects, especially among novice users and younger demographics.

Summary

House Bill 191, introduced by Representative Marcus S. Vaughn, seeks to amend Massachusetts General Laws regarding the regulations on the potency of THC products sold in the state. The bill proposes to set specific THC potency limits for various types of recreational cannabis products, including marijuana flowers and concentrates. It establishes caps on the THC content permissible in these products, specifically limiting marijuana flower potency to a maximum of 30% THC and imposing dosage restrictions on concentrates intended for inhalation, requiring them to not exceed 5mg per serving. Additionally, the bill aims to enforce clear labeling on concentrated forms of marijuana products to ensure measured servings are communicated to consumers.

Contention

While the bill is positioned as a public health initiative, it is likely to stimulate notable debate among stakeholders in the cannabis industry. Critics may argue that these potency limits could hinder product innovation and restrict consumer choice, particularly for seasoned consumers who might prefer higher potency options. Conversely, proponents of the legislation believe it is essential for safeguarding public health and preventing potential addiction issues linked to the consumption of high-THC cannabis products. As discussions progress, the balance between industry regulation and consumer autonomy will be a central point of contention.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MA H187

Relative to cannabis marketing

MA H472

Relative to furthering dealership transparency

MA H188

Relative to cannabis advertisements by out of state dispensaries

MA H3266

Relative to municipal tax collectors

MA H189

Relative to billboard advertisements for cannabis

MA H2558

Relative to prescription eyewear

MA H3799

Relative to new vehicle inspections

MA H2187

Relative to modernizing the unemployment benefits online portal

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.