Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H296

Introduced
2/27/25  

Caption

Protecting vulnerable adults from financial exploitation

Impact

Should H296 be enacted, it will have significant implications for financial services professionals, including broker-dealers and investment advisors. The bill empowers these professionals to delay disbursements from accounts of eligible adults if there is reasonable suspicion of financial exploitation. Brokers and advisors must notify relevant agencies and take appropriate actions to protect at-risk adults. This measure is anticipated to create a robust framework within which financial institutions can operate to identify and prevent exploitation, thus enhancing the legal protections available for vulnerable adults.

Summary

House Bill 296 aims to protect vulnerable adults, particularly those aged 60 and over or disabled individuals, from financial exploitation. The bill introduces a new chapter to the General Laws of Massachusetts that explicitly defines 'financial exploitation' and lays down provisions for prevention and reporting. Key definitions provided in the bill include eligible adults, financial exploitation, and agents responsible for managing the affairs of these individuals. This legislation is a critical step in addressing the growing concern over the financial abuse of vulnerable populations, emphasizing the need to safeguard their assets and ensuring they are not subjected to undue influence or manipulation.

Contention

The discussions surrounding H296 reflect a range of opinions on the effectiveness and necessity of such legislative measures. While proponents argue that the bill is vital in combating financial exploitation, critics may raise concerns about the potential burdens placed on financial institutions and the fear of misuse of the delay provision. Furthermore, there might be discussions on how these protective measures may impact the services rendered to financially vulnerable adults and whether they could inadvertently hinder legitimate transactions. Striking a balance between protection and accessibility remains a central theme in the ongoing debates on this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.