Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts Senate Bill S1832

Introduced
2/27/25  

Caption

Allowing Wayne Estes, a retired member of the Massachusetts DDS, an accidental disability retirement option

Impact

The legislation represents a significant alteration to existing retirement guidelines under Chapter 32 of the General Laws, which typically govern the disability retirement options available to public service employees. By allowing for the presumption of disability due to PTSD along with other impairments, the bill aims to create a supportive framework for retired employees who have suffered severe trauma during their service. This is particularly pertinent in discussions surrounding mental health, where previous barriers may have prevented individuals from qualifying for retirement benefits in similar situations.

Notice

If passed, S1832 would allow Wayne Estes to receive retrospective accidental disability retirement benefits, effective from the date of the bill's passage. There is a stipulated timeline within which he must notify the board of his decision regarding the options granted under this legislation.

Summary

Bill S1832, presented by Senator Peter J. Durant, proposes to allow Wayne Estes, a retired member of the Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services (DDS), the option for an accidental disability retirement. This provision specifically addresses health conditions resulting from physical and psychological harm, accompanied by post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). According to the bill, the retirement system would now recognize such disabilities as presumptively incurred during the course of employment, thereby enabling Estes to claim the benefits he seeks.

Contention

While the text of the bill does not outline explicit points of contention, it highlights an ongoing discourse about the treatment of mental health in retirement systems. Advocates for the bill may argue that it is a necessary step towards recognizing the complexities of mental health issues faced by public service employees. Conversely, some might express concerns regarding the implications of such legislation on the retirement fund's finances or whether it sets a precedent for other similar cases, thus potentially opening floodgates for additional claims.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.