Discouraging employers from closing call centers and customer service operations in the Commonwealth and relocating overseas, and for other purposes
Impact
The bill mandates that if a company violates the relocation notice requirement, it may face civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each day of non-compliance. Furthermore, any employer listed for relocation would become ineligible for state grants or loan benefits for five years following their relocation. These provisions are expected to deter firms from moving out of state and encourage them to maintain operations within Massachusetts, thereby safeguarding local employment opportunities. By compiling and distributing a list of relocating employers, state agencies will have a transparent record of businesses that have opted to leave the state, possibly affecting their future dealings with government entities.
Summary
S2142, presented by Senator Paul R. Feeney, aims to discourage employers from closing call centers and customer service operations in Massachusetts and relocating overseas. The bill seeks to protect jobs by imposing a mandatory notification period of 120 days prior to any planned relocation. This period allows for potential mitigation efforts to be explored before the closure of significant employment operations. It defines employers as those with 50 or more employees engaged in relevant operations, thus focusing on larger businesses that have the capacity to impact employment within the Commonwealth significantly.
Contention
Notably, the bill includes provisions for certain exceptions in which penalties could be waived if non-compliance would lead to substantial job losses or environmental harm. This caveat allows some flexibility for employers who may face extenuating circumstances. Critics may argue that while the intention is to protect jobs, the stringent penalties might dissuade companies from operating in Massachusetts altogether or may lead to legal challenges regarding the enforceability of such notifications. The balance between protecting jobs and providing a favorable business environment will be a critical point of discussion as the bill progresses.
REPORT of the SPECIAL JOINT COMMITTEE on INITIATIVE PETITIONS on the INITIATIVE PETITION of CHARLES DEWEY ELLISON, III AND OTHERS FOR THE PASSAGE OF AN ACT ESTABLISHING THAT APP-BASED DRIVERS ARE NOT EMPLOYEES, AND NETWORK COMPANIES ARE NOT EMPLOYERS, FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES OF THE GENERAL LAWS (see House, No. 4257)
REPORT of the SPECIAL JOINT COMMITTEE on INITIATIVE PETITIONS on the INITIATIVE PETITION of CHARLES DEWEY ELLISON, III AND OTHERS FOR THE PASSAGE OF AN ACT ESTABLISHING THAT APP-BASED DRIVERS ARE NOT EMPLOYEES, AND NETWORK COMPANIES ARE NOT EMPLOYERS, FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES OF THE GENERAL LAWS (see House, No. 4260)
REPORT of the SPECIAL JOINT COMMITTEE on INITIATIVE PETITIONS on the INITIATIVE PETITION of CHARLES DEWEY ELLISON, III AND OTHERS FOR THE PASSAGE OF AN ACT ESTABLISHING THAT APP-BASED DRIVERS ARE NOT EMPLOYEES, AND NETWORK COMPANIES ARE NOT EMPLOYERS, FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES OF THE GENERAL LAWS (see House, No. 4259)
Providing affordable and accessible high-quality early education and care to promote child development and well-being and support the economy in the Commonwealth
Resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to the existential threats posed by nuclear weapons and climate change to the commonwealth of Massachusetts