Maryland House Bill HB1052

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/22
• Refer: 2/10/22
• Report Pass: 3/18/22
• Engrossed: 3/21/22
• Refer: 3/21/22
• Report Pass: 4/8/22
• Enrolled: 4/9/22
• Chaptered: 4/21/22
• Passed: 4/21/22

Caption

Public Safety - Natural Gas and Liquefied Propane Piping Systems - Construction Requirements (Flynn and Laird Act)

Summary

House Bill 1052, known as the Flynn and Laird Act, establishes new construction requirements for fuel gas piping systems in Maryland. The bill mandates that only specific materials, namely black iron pipe or arc-resistant jacketed corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST), can be used in the construction of natural gas and liquefied propane piping systems for both residential and commercial buildings. This regulation aims to enhance public safety by ensuring that these piping systems meet certain standards and reduce risks associated with gas leaks and related hazards. Furthermore, if a gas appliance is replaced within a building, the connecting gas line must also adhere to these material specifications. The impact of HB1052 on state laws is significant as it directly addresses safety issues concerning fuel gas piping systems. By prohibiting the use of non-arc-resistant materials in new constructions and substantial renovations, the bill seeks to minimize the potential risk of gas line failures and accidents. It is designed to apply prospectively, ensuring that any buildings for which permits were issued before the bill's effective date are not retroactively affected, thereby providing clarity and predictability for builders and property owners. Overall sentiment around HB1052 appears positive, with broad support from legislators, evidenced by its unanimous passage (47-0 votes). Proponents argue that the act delivers essential protections for Maryland residents by mandating stronger construction standards for gas piping systems. The bill is seen as a necessary response to past safety issues and reflects a legislative priority of enhancing public safety in gas transportation. Notable points of contention that may arise include the implications for construction costs and the potential burden placed on builders who must comply with the new material requirements. While supporters emphasize that these regulations will improve safety, opponents may argue that increased compliance requirements could lead to higher costs passed on to consumers. The balance between stringent safety standards and economic feasibility for the construction industry is likely to be a topic of continued discussion.