Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB1086

Introduced
2/10/22  
Refer
2/10/22  
Report Pass
3/7/22  
Engrossed
3/10/22  
Refer
3/11/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Enrolled
3/31/22  
Chaptered
4/12/22  

Caption

Opioid Restitution Fund - Appropriation of Settlement Funds and Grant Program

Impact

This legislation has significant implications for state laws regarding the allocation and use of funds derived from opioid settlements. The bill requires that appropriations from the fund align with existing settlement agreements and emphasizes the importance of enhancing access to treatment and preventive measures for substance abuse. By establishing parameters for the use of these funds, the bill aims to create a structured approach to address the multifaceted challenges posed by the opioid crisis.

Summary

House Bill 1086, titled 'Opioid Restitution Fund - Appropriation of Settlement Funds and Grant Program', is primarily aimed at addressing the ongoing opioid crisis through the establishment of a designated fund for opioid-related restitution. The bill mandates that certain funds be appropriated from the Opioid Restitution Fund, which consists of revenues from various settlements with opioid manufacturers. Furthermore, it outlines the creation of a grant program to distribute these funds to political subdivisions, enhancing local initiatives aimed at combating the effects of opioid misuse.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1086 appears to be supportive, evidenced by its unanimous passage in the voting process. Lawmakers seem to view the establishment of the Opioid Restitution Fund as a crucial step in addressing the ongoing public health emergency resulting from opioid misuse. While the bill has garnered positive feedback for its focus on treatment and prevention, there could be concerns about the effectiveness and distribution of funds at the local level.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the oversight and management of the funds allocated through the grant program. Critics may question whether sufficient measures are in place to ensure that the funds are used as intended and whether local governments have the capacity to implement effective programs. Additionally, ongoing discussions should focus on accountability, the performance of funded programs, and the overall impact on reducing opioid-related incidents within communities.

Companion Bills

MD SB419

Crossfiled Opioid Restitution Fund - Appropriation of Settlement Funds and Grant Program

Previously Filed As

MD SB419

Opioid Restitution Fund - Appropriation of Settlement Funds and Grant Program

MD HB1087

Opioid Restitution Fund - State-Subdivision Agreement and Grant Program

MD HB729

Public Health - Use of Opioid Restitution Fund and Training Under the Overdose Response Program

MD SB594

Public Health - Use of Opioid Restitution Fund and Training Under the Overdose Response Program

MD HB728

Opioid Restitution Fund - Authorized Uses

MD SB495

Opioid Restitution Fund - Authorized Uses

MD HB571

Opioids - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund and Overdose Response Program

MD HB794

Public Health – Opioid Restitution Fund Advisory Council

MD SB751

Public Health – Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund – Revisions

MD HB980

Public Health - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund - Revisions

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.