Counties and Municipalities - Water Transfer Fee - Authorization
Impact
Should HB1328 be enacted, it will significantly impact state laws regarding local governance and environmental management, particularly in the domain of water rights and usage. By authorizing local governments to impose fees related to water transfer permits, it empowers these governing bodies to generate revenue and control practices that could lead to over-extraction of water resources. This aligns with a growing trend toward localized environmental management and underscores the importance of watershed health in sustainable resource planning.
Summary
House Bill 1328 seeks to authorize counties and municipalities in Maryland to impose a fee on individuals or entities that hold a permit for transferring either surface water or groundwater outside their respective watersheds. This measure aims to provide local governments with greater control over water resources and manage the implications of water transfer activities that can impact local water availability and environmental conditions. The proposed bill is particularly relevant for areas facing water scarcity or management issues as it directly addresses how water resources can be utilized and monitored by local jurisdictions.
Contention
The introduction of HB1328 raises potential points of contention, particularly concerning the balance of power between state authorities and local governments. Stakeholders may have differing views on how such authority should be exercised, particularly in regions with contrasting environmental needs or economic pressures. Critics might argue that allowing local governments to impose fees could lead to inconsistent regulatory environments across the state, which could confuse businesses engaged in water transfer operations. Additionally, there may be concerns about how these fees are structured and the potential financial burden on permit holders, particularly in agricultural sectors reliant on water resources.
Updating and expanding the storm water planning requirements to be undertaken by counties; authorizing counties to regulate storm water within a watershed-based planning area; authorizing the formation of water resources management authorities; enabling counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities to develop integrated water resources management plans; imposing duties and conferring powers on the Department of Environmental Protection, the Environmental Quality Board, counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities; providing for financing and for waiver of use for certain grant or loan funds; establishing the Integrated Water Resources Management Account; and making repeals.
Updating and expanding the storm water planning requirements to be undertaken by counties; authorizing counties to regulate storm water within a watershed-based planning area; authorizing the formation of water resources management authorities; enabling counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities to develop integrated water resources management plans; imposing duties and conferring powers on the Department of Environmental Protection, the Environmental Quality Board, counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities; providing for financing and for waiver of use for certain grant or loan funds; establishing the Integrated Water Resources Management Account; and making repeals.
Creating the Kansas office of natural resources within the executive branch and transferring certain duties of the Kansas water office, and the department of agriculture, division of conservation and division of water resources to such office.
Relating to the transfer of the administration of surface water rights permitting from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to the Texas Water Development Board and the regulation of groundwater; authorizing fees; authorizing civil penalties.