Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB136

Introduced
1/12/22  
Refer
1/12/22  
Report Pass
2/21/22  
Engrossed
2/24/22  
Refer
2/25/22  
Report Pass
3/31/22  
Enrolled
4/11/22  

Caption

Education - Public and Nonpublic Schools - Seizure Action Plans (Brynleigh's Act)

Impact

This legislation will have a significant impact on school health policies as it introduces more structured protocols for dealing with seizure emergencies. Schools will need to educate their staff not only on seizure recognition but also on the legal and procedural frameworks surrounding the administration of medications. By ensuring that at least two trained individuals are present, it aims to mitigate risks associated with seizures in school environments, enhancing the overall safety of students with medical conditions.

Summary

House Bill 136, known as Brynleigh’s Act, mandates that public and nonpublic schools in Maryland establish seizure action plans to address the needs of students diagnosed with seizure disorders. Starting in the 2023-2024 school year, each public school must train at least two personnel in recognizing seizures and providing appropriate first aid. This training will include administering seizure medications under specific conditions, ensuring that staff are prepared to act in emergency situations concerning students with these health conditions. Moreover, the bill outlines the requirements for parental involvement in creating individualized seizure action plans for their children.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 136 appears to be supportive, reflecting a growing awareness of the importance of health management in educational settings. Stakeholders, including health professionals and educators, recognize the need for proper training to safeguard students’ health. Although there may have been discussions on the logistics of implementing these training measures or concerns about the resources required, the overarching sentiment leans toward the necessity of this legislation to ensure student safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specific training requirements and the responsibilities placed upon school personnel. Critics may argue about the additional burden on school resources and staff time, particularly regarding the training frequency and content. The bill's stipulations demand collaboration between parents and schools, potentially raising concerns about the varying degrees of engagement from families in developing seizure action plans. This could lead to differing implementations and the effectiveness of the bill across various school districts.

Companion Bills

MD SB299

Crossfiled Education - Public and Nonpublic Schools - Seizure Action Plans (Brynleigh's Act)

Similar Bills

CA SB652

Dentistry: use of sedation: training.

CA AB743

Pupil health: self-administration of prescribed asthma medication.

CA SB1022

Emergency medical services: certifying examination.

CA AB966

Pupil health: medication assistance.

CA AB1651

Pupil health: emergency medical care: epinephrine auto-injectors.

IL HB3428

SCH CD-OPIOID ANTAGONIST

IL SB0094

ASTHMA INHALERS-CARE PROGRAM

CA SB577

California Department of Tax and Fee Administration: State Board of Equalization: administrative and personnel services.