Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB219

Introduced
1/13/22  
Refer
1/13/22  
Report Pass
2/21/22  
Engrossed
2/24/22  
Refer
2/25/22  
Report Pass
4/1/22  
Enrolled
4/5/22  

Caption

Dental Hygienists – Consultation Requirements – Health Care Practitioners

Impact

The impact of HB 219 is significant as it modifies existing consultation requirements to better reflect the collaborative nature of modern health care practices. By specifying that consultations must occur particularly when there is a change in the patient's medical condition, the bill aims to enhance patient safety and ensure that dental hygienists are adequately supported in their decision-making process. This alignment seeks to improve treatment outcomes for patients receiving dental hygiene services.

Summary

House Bill 219, titled 'Dental Hygienists - Consultation Requirements - Health Care Practitioners', introduces amendments to the existing regulations governing the practice of dental hygiene. The bill alters the types of health care practitioners with whom a dental hygienist must consult prior to providing treatment. Notably, the bill expands the list of professionals to include registered nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and licensed certified midwives. This change emphasizes the importance of collaboration among health care providers in ensuring comprehensive patient care.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 219 appears to be largely positive among the legislative body. During discussions, there was a consensus on the importance of interdisciplinary communication in healthcare settings. The bill passed the third reading with a unanimous vote of 46-0, indicating strong support from legislators. This overwhelming approval signifies a recognition of the critical role that dental hygienists play in patient health and the necessity for them to work alongside various health care practitioners.

Contention

While the bill sees broad support, some concerns may arise about the practical implications of these expanded consultation requirements. Critics might point to the potential for increased bureaucracy in allowing consultations, which could delay treatment for patients. However, the overarching theme in discussions suggests that the benefits of improved patient safety and collaborative care outweigh such concerns. Overall, HB 219 is seen as a progressive step towards enhancing the integration of dental hygiene services within the broader health care framework.

Companion Bills

MD SB306

Crossfiled Dental Hygienists - Consultation Requirements - Health Care Practitioners

Similar Bills

MD SB306

Dental Hygienists - Consultation Requirements - Health Care Practitioners

WV HB3196

Teledentistry Practice Act

WV SB710

Relating to the practice of teledentistry

RI H7818

Permits reimbursement for dental hygienists from "other insurance" or a third party payor such as Medicare.

RI S2815

Permits reimbursement for dental hygienists from "other insurance" or a third party payor such as Medicare.

RI H5736

Permits reimbursement for dental hygienist's from "other insurance" or a third-party payor such as Medicare.

RI S0609

Permits reimbursement for dental hygienist's from "other insurance" or a third-party payor such as Medicare.

OK SB408

Dentistry; examinations; licensure; continuing education; records. Effective date. Emergency.