Maryland House Bill HB220

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/22
• Refer: 1/13/22
• Report Pass: 2/14/22
• Engrossed: 2/17/22
• Refer: 2/18/22
• Report Pass: 4/8/22
• Enrolled: 4/9/22
• Chaptered: 5/29/22

Caption

Health Occupations – State Board of Massage Therapy Examiners – Requiring License to Practice and Other Revisions

Impact

The legislation will phase out the option for individuals to be registered to practice massage therapy in non-health care settings. It also alters educational requirements for licensure, increasing the contact hours required for massage therapy programs from 600 to 750. The bill prescribes strict guidelines to ensure that all massage therapy practices adhere to high standards, potentially improving overall quality and safety in the profession. As a result, unregistered practice will be met with civil penalties, thereby discouraging non-compliance among practitioners.

Summary

House Bill 220 seeks to implement significant changes regarding the licensure and regulation of massage therapists in Maryland. One of the primary objectives of HB220 is to ensure that practicing massage therapists are properly licensed by the State Board of Massage Therapy Examiners, thereby enhancing the professionalism and security within the industry. The bill mandates an electronic roster of licensed massage therapists to be maintained by the Board, increasing transparency for consumers and the accountability of practitioners in the field.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB220 has been largely positive among legislative members who view it as a crucial step toward ensuring that only qualified individuals practice massage therapy in Maryland. Supporters believe that increased licensing requirements will protect clients and enhance the credibility of the profession. However, some concerns have been raised about the increased barrier to entry for potential practitioners and whether these requirements may disproportionately affect marginalized groups seeking careers in massage therapy.

Contention

There has been notable contention regarding the changes to educational requirements, with critics arguing that the increased number of contact hours could limit access to the profession for aspiring therapists. Additionally, the timeline for transitioning from registration to licensure is tight, and it raises questions about the preparedness of current practitioners to comply with new regulations. The debate reflects broader discussions on regulation in professional fields and the balance between ensuring safety and facilitating access to employment.