Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB714

Introduced
1/31/22  
Refer
1/31/22  
Report Pass
3/14/22  
Engrossed
3/16/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Enrolled
4/11/22  
Chaptered
5/12/22  

Caption

Bay Restoration Fund - Intended Use Plans and Privately Owned Wastewater Facilities

Impact

The bill impacts state laws regarding environmental protection and funding for wastewater facilities. It specifically prohibits the Department of the Environment from providing financial assistance to privately owned facilities that have not complied with discharge permits within a defined timeframe. This sets a stricter compliance standard and ensures that public funds are only allocated to facilities demonstrating adherence to environmental regulations, thereby enhancing overall water quality management.

Summary

House Bill 714, known as the Bay Restoration Fund - Intended Use Plans and Privately Owned Wastewater Facilities, focuses on the funding and regulatory aspects concerning privately owned wastewater facilities within Maryland. The bill requires the Department of the Environment to submit intended use plans to the General Assembly and alters the definition of privately owned wastewater facilities to clarify the awarding of grants from the Bay Restoration Fund. This emphasizes a structured approach to enhance water quality through compliance with necessary discharge permits.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 714 appears to lean towards support from environmental advocates and regulatory bodies aiming to enhance compliance and funding transparency in wastewater management. However, there may be concerns from facility operators regarding the strict compliance requirements, particularly for those facing financial constraints. The discussion surrounding the bill generally reflects a commitment to improve the environmental standards and funding mechanisms.

Contention

Key points of contention associated with the bill may relate to the strict definitions and compliance requirements imposed on privately owned wastewater facilities. Opponents may argue that the financial capacity requirement could hinder smaller operators from securing necessary upgrades and compliance funding. Conversely, proponents assert that the bill ensures that only compliant facilities benefit from public funding, ultimately safeguarding public interests and environmental integrity.

Companion Bills

MD SB354

Crossfiled Bay Restoration Fund - Intended Use Plans and Privately Owned Wastewater Facilities

Similar Bills

MD SB354

Bay Restoration Fund - Intended Use Plans and Privately Owned Wastewater Facilities

MD HB318

Environment - On-Site Wastewater Services - Regulation

MD SB479

Environment - On-Site Wastewater Services - Regulation

MD HB747

Environment - On-Site Wastewater Systems - Requirements for Inspection and Pumping Services and Extension of Sunset and Implementation Dates

MD HB1311

Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund - Authorized Uses (Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund Lockbox Act of 2022)

MD SB7

Environment - On-Site Wastewater Services - Board, Fees, and Penalties

MD HB30

Environment - On-Site Wastewater Services - Board, Fees, and Penalties

MD HB1478

Bay Restoration Fund - Authorized Uses - Decommission of Wastewater Treatment Lagoon