Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB926

Introduced
2/7/22  
Refer
2/7/22  
Report Pass
3/15/22  
Engrossed
3/17/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Report Pass
4/4/22  
Enrolled
4/11/22  

Caption

Vehicle Laws - Mechanical Repair Contracts - Policies of Insurance

Impact

By implementing this bill, Maryland seeks to strengthen the regulatory framework surrounding mechanical repair contracts. The change aims to protect consumers from potential losses due to nonperformance by obligors. The requirement for adequate insurance reserves establishes a safety net for consumers who may need to rely on these contracts for vehicle repairs. Furthermore, the law aims to solidify accountability among obligors, as they are now required to register annually and keep detailed records, which would help in consumer redressal.

Summary

House Bill 926 addresses the issue of mechanical repair contracts and their associated insurance policies in Maryland. The bill mandates that obligors under such contracts must provide coverage for nonperformance, thereby safeguarding consumers who purchase these contracts. It allows for insurance policies covering these obligations to be maintained with certain risk retention groups, which broadens the scope of insurance options available to obligors, thus enhancing consumer protection.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB926 has been largely positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups who see it as a necessary measure to enhance consumer rights. Supporters argue that it provides essential protections and helps build trust in the vehicle maintenance industry. However, some stakeholders within the auto repair industry warn of potential increased costs associated with compliance, which could be passed onto consumers. This has sparked a dialogue about balancing consumer protection with operational viability for businesses.

Contention

A notable point of contention lies in the potential additional costs that may arise for businesses required to comply with the new regulations. Some critics argue that while the intent behind the bill is commendable, the implementation might lead to increased expenses and administrative burdens on small businesses, which could impact their ability to offer competitive pricing. The legislation may also present challenges for enforcement, as ensuring compliance among all obligors could prove complex.

Companion Bills

MD SB697

Crossfiled Vehicle Laws - Mechanical Repair Contracts - Policies of Insurance

Similar Bills

MD SB697

Vehicle Laws - Mechanical Repair Contracts - Policies of Insurance

MD HB973

Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations and Pharmacy Benefits Managers - Contracts

MD SB823

Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations and Pharmacy Benefits Managers – Contracts

MD SB3

Workgroup on the Creation of a Data Dashboard for Public Work Contracts and Apprentices - Establishment

MD HB850

Workgroup on the Creation of a Data Dashboard for Public Work Contracts and Apprentices - Establishment

MD SB1

State Finance and Procurement – Prevailing Wage – Stop Work Orders

MD HB907

Garrett County - Procurement - Bids and Contracts

MD SB558

Garrett County - Procurement - Bids and Contracts